How to Rate Reviews by Genre and Why It’s the Better Way
I want to start this post with one simple question: Should we base our ratings for reviews on the genre?
I would argue yes. Think about it. While the deliciously fun Vampire Academy Series is fabulous for its genre (being a YA paranormal romance series of books), can it compare to the literary genius of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice or F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby? No.
So, how can I rate these types of books following the same rating pattern? How could almost any novel deserve five stars compared to the great masterpieces of all time?
RELATED The Appeal of the Old-Fashioned Romance & Why It’s Still In Style
Now, that doesn’t mean that ‘genre’ pieces can’t be as literary as ‘realistic fiction’ (which is honestly just another genre anyway). To say that Tolkien’s genius cannot be considered one of the great novels of its time just because it’s fantasy is just snobbery and pretentious nonsense.
Nevertheless, fantasy is often sneered at in the film, television, and literary world (though the barriers are starting to break down a little). For instance, hardly any fantasy films get nominated for Academy Awards, and genre shows are almost always snubbed at the Emmys (including actor performances certainly deserving of a nomination).
So, what can we (readers and reviewers) do about this dilemma?
There’s not much we can do about the film industry itself, but we can still rate based on the style of the book we’re reading or the film we’re watching. Reward writers and filmmakers for their hard work if they succeed in their goals.
Is Pirates of the Caribbean worthy of five stars because it’s entertaining and well made for the style of film it aims to be? I would give it a five-star rating. However, I would also give Joe Wright’s artistic masterpiece Atonement five stars.
Atonement is the more artistic film, but that was its purpose. Pirates of the Caribbean, on the other hand, had a different purpose: to entertain with good storytelling, great special effects, and memorable 3-dimensional characters.
There’s not a lot we can do about the film industry itself but we can still rate based on the style of book we’re reading or film we’re watching.
Should we still critique bad writing? Plot holes and weak one-dimensional characters, etc.? Yes. But let us consider the aim of the book, too. Sometimes, we just want a fun beach read that’s good for being just that. Let us appreciate all types of writing, something we should consider before giving a book a low rating on Amazon just because we didn’t ‘like’ the genre. That hurts the writer.
So that is why, on this entertainment blog anyway, we consider the style when we rate. We rate based on the purpose of the film, TV show, or book. We do rate based on the genre. You should give it a try, too!
Remember, you only have to consider the genre, the storyteller’s intent, and the targeted audience and give ratings based on whether or not the story proved successful.
If more critics rated by genre, we’d have a wider variety of stories to enjoy and more well-rounded award shows.
I absolutely agree! It’s important to remember the targeted audience as well. I try not to over analyze when reviewing a novel outside of my genre comfort zone. It can be a rewarding experience if you keep an open mind. Great topic!
I think it’s really important too! It always drives me crazy when I read pretentious reviews about why something isn’t high art. Well, not everything is meant to be. Nor should everything be. And yeah, an open mind is always a good thing! Thanks for the comment!