It seems Little Women adaptations are all the rage right now! So, you just knew there was going to be a contemporary one. Well, I went into this adaptation expecting very little.
One, this was an indie film with a seemingly lower budget. Not to mention, the new writer/director, Clare Niederpruem, was behind it with very little experience. If I’m also being honest, I expected one of the lesser-quality faith-based films with bad acting and writing.
But instead, I was pleasantly surprised. This is a faithful adaptation of Louisa May Alcott’s book – even if it’s in the modern day. And Niederpruem proves she’s an up and coming filmmaker to watch out for.
The Story
In this modern retelling of the beloved novel, the story follows the lives of the March sisters: Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy! In this version, Jo is an aspiring YA author who loves to write genre fiction! But no one’s taking her novel seriously. Especially not Professor Bhaer who agrees to help edit and improve her book.
Though he clearly has an ulterior motive for helping her! What follows are flashbacks that lead to the present day as the March sisters grow from children to women. Their bond unites them despite any and all hardships they face – including the ultimate tragedy.
The Review
What surprised me most about this adaptation was just how faithful it was to the original classic book by Alcott. And how seamlessly it was adapted to fit contemporary times – proving just how timeless this story is and will continue to be.
The cast of actors was quite good with Lea Thompson leading the March family as Marmee. The script was decent with believable and heartfelt dialogue. And all the right plot points and beats are there. The bond between sisters. The struggle to be moral in a contemporary world. The best friendship between Jo and Laurie. Even the father who’s away at war.
RELATED: Vintage Book Review: Louisa May Alcott’s ‘Little Men’
However, this is not a perfect film. The jump cuts between the present and the past was a little bit confusing at times. The editing also could be cleaner. There were a few times Sarah Davenport interpreted Jo as a little too agitated – though she mostly did a good job.
There were also some strange inconsistencies. Like why was Jo at a college when she didn’t go to college pitching her book to professors instead of literary agents or publishing houses?
But what the film does have a lot in spades is heart. Plus, I have to give Niederpruem props for making Professor Bhaer more attractive than he typically is to me. Yep, I’m #TeamLaurie.
Maybe it’s because I’m a writer and I relate too much to Jo in some ways but the thought of a man telling you what and how to write just grates on my last nerve. As if realistic fiction is superior to fantasy! It’s such a snobbish view that never warms me to Bhaer. Not even in this adaptation because Jo ONLY relies on Bhaer, one man’s opinion, when it comes to her fantasy novel.
That said, Ian Bohen as “Freddie” is just a little bit swoon-worthy!
OVERALL THOUGHTS
Overall, if you love Little Women and can appreciate a contemporary adaptation that’s akin to a decent Hallmark drama, then you’ll likely appreciate this little-known movie.
Content Note: PG-13 for teen drinking and thematic elements. Should be fine for the whole family.
Where to Watch: You can rent/buy the film on Digital (IE: Amazon). You can also now buy on DVD.
What are your thoughts on this adaptation of Little Women? Did you enjoy it? Or were you left disappointed?
I really wanted to watch this movie, but it never arrived at my local theaters. I’m glad to hear it is worth taking a look at. I finally read the novel last month which has given me some new perspectives and opinions about the characters and their relationships. It makes me want to re-watch some of the other Little Women adaptations for comparison’s sake.
Yeah, it’s not a perfect film by any means. But it’s an enjoyable one! And yes, the novel is a bit different to the film and TV adaptations. It seems most adaptations, for instance, try to make Bhaer more romantic than he actually is in the book so, the audience will accept him. I’ve read Alcott’s journals and letters and it’s clear she made Bhaer unappealing on purpose. She would have preferred to see Jo remain single! Which I kind of agree with. Even though I love Laurie. 🙂 Anyway, this is definitely an adaptation worth checking out.
Maybe one-day we will be blessed with an adaption that has Jo remain single. Possibly with an ending showing her sailing off to Europe while the sun rises.
I would like to see this adaption.
I always felt Bhaer and Jo’s relationship came off more as fathelry then romantic. Oooh, I can just imagine Little Men with Jo being single.
I personally believe Jo no longer writting what she enjoyed writting was something Ms.Alcott did since this was one of her “wholesome” stories (and possibly her editor or the parents of some of the children reading the story, etc. asked that Jo be reprimanded for writing trashy/unwholesome stories.). Most, if not all, of Ms.Alcott’s wholesome/children’s stories have things put down as “moraly wrong” etc., even if she personally didn’t believe that. Actually, most of her published works were in the definite “unmoral” category, and like Jo’s parents in Little Women, Alcott’s parents saw nothing wrong with those stories.